Contemporary philosophers of religion have predominantly focused on understanding the nature of FAITH, yet there has been a lack of attention towards a particular type of FAITH that we can call inquiry-based FAITH. This paper aims to address this gap by exploring some challenges associated with inquiry-based FAITH. I argue, in particular, that while this is a widespread kind of FAITH, we face a dilemma in showing how it is possible and plausible. On the one hand, FAITH that P requires acceptance of P, and on the other, if someone is inquiring into whether P is the case, she must not already accept that P is the case. Borrowing a conceptual framework from recent literature on inquiry, I propose a solution to this dilemma by appealing to parts of the story of Abraham in the Quran. I suggest, specifically, that one can have FAITH that a partial answer to a question is the case, and at the same time, seek further inquiry into the question for a more complete answer. As such, I support the idea that inquiry-based FAITH is a possible and plausible option for both FAITHful people and inquirers.